What: This seminar is designed to facilitate critical discussion of research projects at various stages of their development. Each term I hope to attract ~8-12 participants with various backgrounds who are interested in helping colleagues work through problems they have encountered in their research (such as the formulation of hypotheses, synthesis of existing research, design of experiments, analysis of experimental and comparative data, interpretation of complex data).
Format: We will meet for 2 hours one evening/week for 12 or so weeks of the semester. During the first 20-30 minutes of each evening, the lead discussant will introduce a problem. The introduction should include: a) 5-10 minutes during which they lay out the conceptual framework for their research (this should emphasize general ideas, concepts, theory; it should not involve reference to the specific study system); b) 10-15 minutes during which they provide the necessary detail about the study study and background data. This orientation should be specific and focused - it will establish the foundation and focus for the evening's discussion. c) The presentation should end with specific statement about the evening's goals: what problems do you want the group to help resolve? The remaining 1.5 hours will be spent in lively and critical discussion with the primary purpose of improving the discussion leader's research program, and indirectly helping all of us improve our own research by further developing our abilities to (i) ask compelling ecological and evolutionary questions, (ii) apply appropriate tools to resolve those questions; (iii) detect flaws in methodology, approaches and inference, and (iv) suggest insightful solutions to these problems (i.e., propose alternative methods, approaches, and interpretations). Short readings might be assigned to provide background and/or to facilitate discussion, but I mostly anticipate detailed discussions focused on the student’s research: i.e., participants should not have to "prepare" (but I expect the discussion leader to do considerable preparation).
Who: Graduate students, faculty, post-docs, as well as advanced undergraduates with research experience. Because feedback at all stages in a research project is critical to its success, I hope to have a cross-section of students at all stages in their graduate training. Because diverse feedback from people with different perspectives also is critical, I hope to attract students from a wide range of labs and interests. [Although this format is much like a "lab meeting", it is designed to provide a broader base of critical feedback and to include more novel perspectives than you might get from a smaller group of "like-minded" peers.] I welcome students from any department on campus with interests in ecology, environmental science, comparative biology, or evolutionary biology.
When and Where: Monday, 5-7pm; at my home (address in email sent to class).
Date
Discussion Leader
Jan 13
Rebecca Atkins
January 20
No Class -- UGA Holiday (MLK)
January 27
Julie Blaze
February 03
Laura Nasland
February 10
No class - Osenberg lab at UF
February 17
Cece Working
February 24
Laura Rack
March 02
No class -- due to illness
March 09
No Class -- Spring Break
March 16
No class due to covid-19 instructional hiatus
March 23
No class due to covid-19 instructional hiatus
March 30
Nate Tomczyk and Cody Prouty
April 06
Caitlin Conn
April 13
Amy Briggs
April 20
Daniel Suh & Jasmine Badiee
April 27
Theresa Hudson & Carol Yang
Other participants: Cinder