2022 Spring

What: This seminar is designed to facilitate critical discussion of research projects at various stages of their development. Each term I hope to attract ~8-12 participants with various backgrounds who are interested in helping colleagues work through problems they have encountered in their research (such as the formulation of hypotheses, synthesis of existing research, design of experiments, analysis of experimental and comparative data, interpretation of complex data).
Format: We will meet for 2 hours one evening/week for 12 or so weeks of the semester.  During the first 20-30 minutes of each evening, the lead discussant will introduce a problem.  The introduction should include: a) 5-10 minutes during which they lay out the conceptual framework for their research (this should emphasize general ideas, concepts, theory; it should not involve reference to the specific study system); b) 10-15 minutes during which they provide the necessary detail about the study study and background data.  This orientation should be specific and focused - it will establish the foundation and focus for the evening's discussion.  c) The presentation should end with specific statement about the evening's goals: what problems do you want the group to help resolve?  The remaining 1.5 hours will be spent in lively and critical discussion with the primary purpose of improving the discussion leader's research program, and indirectly helping all of us improve our own research by further developing our abilities to (i) ask compelling ecological and evolutionary questions, (ii) apply appropriate tools to resolve those questions; (iii) detect flaws in methodology, approaches and inference, and (iv) suggest insightful solutions to these problems (i.e., propose alternative methods, approaches, and interpretations).  Short readings might be assigned to provide background and/or to facilitate discussion, but I mostly anticipate detailed discussions focused on the student’s research: i.e., participants should not have to "prepare" (but I expect the discussion leader to do considerable preparation).
Who: Graduate students, faculty, post-docs, as well as advanced undergraduates with research experience. Because feedback at all stages in a research project is critical to its success, I hope to have a cross-section of students at all stages in their graduate training.  Because diverse feedback from people with different perspectives also is critical, I hope to attract students from a wide range of labs and interests.  [Although this format is much like a "lab meeting", it is designed to provide a broader base of critical feedback and to include more novel perspectives than you might get from a smaller group of "like-minded" peers.]  I welcome students from any department on campus with  interests in ecology, environmental science, comparative biology, or evolutionary biology.
When and Where:  Monday, 7-9pm; at my home (address in email sent to class).


Discussion Leader

January 10

[no meeting this week]

January 17

No Class -- UGA Holiday (MLK)

January 24

Jeff Beauvais

January 31

Carolyn Cummins

February 07

Emlyn Resetarits

February 14

 [none -- in honor of love]

February 21

 Nate Tomczyk

February 28

Megan Tomamichel

March 07

No Class -- Spring Break

March 14

No class [Craig in Moorea]

March 21

Cali Wilson

March 28

Deven Gokhale

April 04

Jacob Simon

April 11

 Eric Walther

April 18

Laura Rack

April 25

TBD (End of semester potluck?)

May 02

TBD (End of semester potluck?)

Other participants:  Amy Briggs, Jeb Byers